TRICARE Reimbursem*nt Manual 6010.61-M, April 1, 2015
Home Health Care (HHC)
Chapter 12
Section 4
Home HealthBenefit Coverage And Reimbursem*nt - Prospective Payment Methodology
Issue Date:
Authority:32CFR 199.2; 32 CFR 199.4(e)(21); 32 CFR 199.6(a)(8)(i)(B); 32 CFR 199.6(b)(4)(xv); and 32 CFR 199.14(j)
Revision:C-79, June 4, 2024
1.0APPLICABILITY
This policy is mandatory forthe reimbursem*nt of services provided either by network or non-network providers.However, alternative network reimbursem*nt methodologies are permittedwhen approved by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) and specificallyincluded in the network provider agreement.
2.0ISSUE
To describe the payment methodologyfor services rendered to a TRICARE eligible beneficiary under a homehealth Plan Of Care (POC) established by a physician for 60-dayepisodes of care.
3.0POLICY
3.1GeneralOverview
3.1.1Under the Prospective PaymentSystem (PPS), the TRICARE Program shall willcontinue to reimburse Home Health Agencies (HHAs) afixed case-mix and wage-adjusted 60-day episode payment amount forprofessional home health services, along with routine and Non-Routine(medical) Supplies (NRS) provided under the beneficiary’s POC. However,starting from CY 2024, Durable Medical Equipment (DME)orthotics, prosthetics, certain vaccines, injectable osteoporosisdrugs, ambulance services operated by the HHA, other drugs and biologicalsadministered by other than oral method, and disposable NegativePressure Wound Therapy (dNPWT) utilizing disposabledevices will be allowed outside the bundled Episode Of Care (EOC)payment rates.
3.1.2The variationin reimbursem*nt among beneficiaries receiving Home Health Care(HHC) under this newly adopted PPS will be dependent on the severityof the beneficiary’s condition and expected resource consumptionover a 60-day EOC, with special reimbursem*nt provisions for major interveningevents, Significant Changes In Condition (SCIC), and low or highresource utilization. The resource consumption of these beneficiarieswill be assessed using Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS)selected data elements. The score values obtained from these selecteddata elements will be used to classify home health beneficiariesinto one of the Home Health Resource Groups (HHRGs) groups, basedon their average expected resource costs relative to other HHC patients.
3.1.3The HHRG classification determinesthe cost weight; i.e., the appropriate case-mix weight adjustmentfactor that indicates the relative resources used and costlinessof treating different patients. The cost weight for a particularHHRG is then multiplied by a standard average prospective payment amountfor a 60-day episode of HHC. The case-mix adjusted standard prospectivepayment amount is then adjusted to reflect the geographic variationin wages to come up with the final HHA payment amount. Examplesof the above calculations will be provided below in order to geta better understanding of the HHA PPS being adopted in this rule,along with the home health benefit structure and applicable reportingrequirements.
3.2EpisodesOf Care (EOCs)
3.2.1The ordinary unit of paymentis based on an authorized 60-day EOC. This episode spans a 60-dayperiod which begins with the start of care date (i.e., with thefirst billable service date) furnished to a beneficiary and ending60 days later. Payment covers the entire EOC regardless of the numberof days of care actually provided during the 60-day period. Theonly exceptions to this standard payment period are when the followingconditions exist: 1) Partial Episode Payment (PEP) adjustment; 2)SCIC adjustment for episodes beginning prior to January 1, 2008;3) Low Utilization Payment Adjustment (LUPA); 4) additional outlierpayment; or 5) medical review determination.
3.2.2If the beneficiary is stillin treatment at the end of the initial 60-day EOC, a decision hasto be made regarding recertification for another 60-day EOC; i.e.,a physician must certify that the beneficiary is correctly assignedto one of the HHRGs. If the decision is to recertify, a new episodewill begin on Day 61 regardless of whether a billable visit is renderedon that day, and ends 60 days later. The HHA will be required toobtain an authorization for the new episode. This pattern wouldcontinue (the next episode would start on the 121st day, the nexton the 181st day, etc.) as long as the beneficiary was receivingservices under a HHA’s POC. Extension of the HHA benefit beyondthe 60th day will require the HHA to fill out a new assessment (OASIS)in order to assign an appropriate HHRG (case-mix category) for thenext 60-day EOC. A revised OASIS, along with the physician’s POCand certification, is required before the HHA submits a bill forthe next 60-day EOC. The timely submission of this information isessential in determining whether the HHRG rate to be paid is appropriateand accurately reflects the beneficiary’s clinical condition. Thereare currently no limits on the number of medically necessary consecutive60-day episodes that beneficiaries may receive under the HHA PPS. Allowingmultiple episodes is intended to assure continuity of care and payment.
3.2.3Consecutive authorized episodeswill be paid at the full prospective rate as long as there are nointervening events or costs which would affect overall resourceutilization under the initially designated case-mix assignment.
3.2.4More than one episode for asingle beneficiary may be authorized for the same or different datesof service. This will occur particularly in situations where thereis a transfer to another HHA, or discharge and readmission to thesame HHA.
3.2.5Payment will be prorated whenan episode ends before the 60th day in the case of a transfer toanother HHA, or in the case of a discharge and readmission withinthe same 60-day period. Claims for episodes may also be submittedprior to the 60th day if the beneficiary has been discharged andtreatment goals have been met, although payment will not be proratedunless more HHC is subsequently billed in the same 60-day period.
3.3Case-Mix Adjustment
3.3.1Elements of the Case-Mix Model
The variation in reimbursem*ntamong beneficiaries receiving HHC under this newly adopted PPS will bedependent on the severity of the beneficiary’s condition and expectedresource consumption over a 60-day EOC with special reimbursem*ntprovisions for major intervening events, SCICs, and low or high resourceutilization. A case-mix system has been developed to measure theseverity and projected resource utilization of beneficiaries receivinghome health services using selected data elements off of the OASISassessment instrument (i.e., the assessment document submitted byHHAs for reimbursem*nt) and an additional element measuring receiptof at least 10 visits for therapy services. These key data elementsare organized and assigned a score value in order to measure theimpact of clinical, functional and services utilization dimensionson total resource use. The resulting summed scores are used to assigna beneficiary to a particular severity level within each of thefollowing domains:
3.3.1.1ClinicalSeverity Domain
The clinicalseverity domain captures significant indicators of clinical needfor several OASIS items. These include patient history, sensory,integument, respiratory, elimination, and neuro/emotional/behavioralstatus. It includes OASIS items pertaining to the following clinicalconditions and risk factors: diagnoses involving orthopedic, neurological,or diabetic conditions; therapies used at home (i.e., intravenoustherapy or infusion therapy, parenteral and enteral nutrition);vision; pain frequency; pressure ulcers, stasis ulcers, burns, traumaand surgical wounds; dyspnea; urinary and bowel incontinence; bowelostomy; and cognitive/behavioral problems, such as impaired decisionmaking and hallucinations. The clinical severity domain has fourseverity levels (0-3) and takes into account the beneficiary’s primarydiagnosis and prevalent medical conditions.
3.3.1.2Functional Dimension
The functional status domainis comprised of six Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) from the ADLsections of the OASIS assessment instrument. These include upperand lower body dressing, bathing, toileting, transferring, and locomotion,and consists of five severity levels (0-4).
3.3.1.3Services Utilization Domain
The services utilization dimensionhas four severity levels (0-3) and includes two types of data elements.First is the patient’s use of inpatient services (both inpatientand Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF)/rehabilitation stays) in the14 days preceding admission to home care. This information is obtainedfrom the patient history section of the OASIS. The second data elementin the service utilization dimension measures home health therapyhours (physical, occupational, or speech/language) totaling eighthours (approximately 10 therapy visits) or more during the 60-dayEOC. The threshold of eight hours targets additional payments forhome health therapy to patients with a clear need for therapy.
3.3.1.4Other Variables Affecting Case-MixAdjustment
3.3.1.4.1Diagnosis. Since home healthdiagnosis is generally used informally to characterize home healthpatients and the types of services they require, it is an importantvariable in the case-mix adjustment process. Since OASIS completionrules require submission of only the first three digits of the InternationalClassification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification(ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code, the analysis used these categories. Sinceindividual analysis of the 900+ codes was not practical, the diagnosiscodes were grouped into Diagnostic Groups (DGs). These were basedon the Quality Indicator Groups (QUIGs) that had been developedfor use in monitoring HHC and outcomes with OASIS. Three of theDGs were found to be statistically significant predictors of homehealth resource use - Orthopedic, Neurologic, and Diabetic. A fourthcategory, Burn/Trauma, is not based on the QUIGs, but was subsequentlyadded to the model to capture patients with high needs for woundcare who are not otherwise captured by existing OASIS items. A listingof the diagnoses codes included in each DG as a primary or secondarydiagnosis is located on the CMS website at http://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/homehealthpps/casemixgroupersoftware.html.For services provided before the mandated date, as directed by Healthand Human Services (HHS), for International Classification of Diseases,10th Revision (ICD-10) implementation, use diagnosis codes as containedin the ICD-9-CM. For services provided on or after the mandateddate, as directed by HHS, for ICD-10 implementation, use diagnosiscodes as contained in the ICD-10-CM.
3.3.1.4.2Secondary Diagnoses. The firstsecondary diagnosis is considered in some cases when the diagnosisof interest for case-mix purposes is a code representing manifestationof an underlying condition which is entered as the primary diagnosis.
3.3.1.4.3Availability of Caregiver.The availability of a caregiver was excluded from the case-mix adjustmentmodel since it was found to add little predictive insight giventhe variables that were already included.
3.3.1.4.4Service Utilization Variables.It was found that patients who had a rehab or SNF discharge, aswell as a hospital discharge, in the 14 days before home healthadmission generally had lower resource use than patients who hadbeen in a rehab or SNF only. It was felt that those who could movefrom a hospital to rehab/SNF to home care in 14 days were makinggood progress, while those who come to home care from a longer rehabor SNF stay likely had more chronic problems, or were progressingmore slowly. Thus, lack of a recent hospital discharge (blank itemM0175, line 1 on the OASIS) would be a definite predictor of resourceutilization.
3.3.2ResponseValues, Scores and Severity Levels
3.3.2.1OASISItem Response Values
The OASIScontains 90 data items. OASIS items responses involve unique statementsthat require an objective assessment, and the number of possibleresponses varies by item.
3.3.2.1.1Each of the possible responseshave point values assigned to them that reflect their relationshipto home health resource utilization.
3.3.2.1.2In most of the items, severalresponses are grouped and assigned one value. For example, for itemM0670 (Bathing), response options 2, 3, 4, or 5 (ranging from “ableto bathe in shower or tub with assistance of another person” to“totally bathed by another person”) are all given a point valueof 8. If the patient had been rated as independent in bathing, however,with response 0, no value is added to the score.
3.3.2.2Point Scoring
The point values for the OASISitems within each of the three domains are summed to determine a patient’spoint score in each domain (clinical, functional and service utilization.)For example, if the response for each of the items listed in theFunctional Domain is a 2, then the score for the domain would becalculated as follows in Figure 12.4-1.
Summing the values for theitems produces a score of 27 for the function domain. | ||
M0650 / M0660 | Dressing | Response 2 has a value of 4,so 4 is added to the score. |
M0670 | Bathing | Response 2 has a value of 8,so 8 is added to the score. |
M0680 | Toileting | Response 2 has a value of 3,so 3 is added to the score. |
M0690 | Transferring | Response 2 has a value of 6,so 6 is added to the score. |
M0700 | Locomotion | Response 2 has a value of 6,so 6 is added to the score. |
3.3.2.3SeverityLevels
Withineach domain, the total score is assigned to a severity level. Forexample, a summed score of 27 in the Functional Domain, as shownabove, would place a patient in the “high” (F3) functional severity level.There are four clinical severity levels, five functional severitylevels, and four service utilization severity levels. The rangeof scoring differs for each domain, so that a score of 25 in theClinical Domain would correspond to a moderate (C2) clinical severitylevel, but a score of 25 in the Functional Domain would place thepatient in the high functional severity level. A patient with ascore of 43 for the Clinical Domain would be placed in the highclinical (C3) severity level, while a patient with a total scoreof six in the Service Domain would be placed in the moderate (S2)severity level for that domain.
3.3.2.4GridSystem of OASIS Items, Values and Scoring
The following figures (Figure 12.4-2 - Figure 12.4-4)list the OASIS items used in the case-mix model, along with correspondingdescriptions, values and scoring:
OASIS+Item | Description | Value | SeverityLevels |
---|---|---|---|
M0230 / M0240 | Primary home care diagnosis(plus first secondary Dx ONLY for selected manifestation codes | -credit only the singlehighest value: If Orthopedic DG, add 11 toscore If Diabetes DG, add 17 to score If Neurological DG, add 20to score | Min (C)= 0-7 Low (C1)= 8-19 Mod (C2)= 20-40 High (C3)= 41+ |
M0250 | IV/Infusion/Parenteral/Enteral Therapies | -credit only the singlehighest value: If box 1, add 14 to score If box 2, add 20 to score If box 3, add 24 to score | |
M0390 | Vision | If box 1 or 2, add 6 to score | |
M0420 | Pain | If box 2 or 3, add 5 to score | |
M0440 | Wound/Lesion | If box 1 and M0230 is Burn/TraumaDG, add 21 to score | |
M0450 | Multiple pressure ulcers | If 2 or more stage 3 or 4 pressureulcers, add 17 to score | Min (C) = 0-7 Low (C1) = 8-19 Mod (C2) = 20-40 High (C3) = 41+ |
M0460 | Most problematic pressure ulcerstage | If box 2, add 14 to score If box 3, add 22 to score | |
M0488 | Surgical wound status | If box 2, add 7 to score If box 3, add 15 to score | |
M0490 | Dyspnea | If box 2, 3 or 4, add 5 toscore | |
M0530 | Urinary incontinence | If box 1 or 2, add 6 to score | |
M0540 | Bowel incontinence | If box 2-5, add 9 to score | |
M0550 | Bowel ostomy | If box 1 or 2, add 10 to score | |
M0610 | Behavioral problems | If box 1-6, add 3 to score |
OASIS+Item | Description | Value | SeverityLevels |
---|---|---|---|
M0650 (current) M0660 (current) | Dressing | If M0650 = box 1, 2, or 3 /or M0660 = box 1, 2, or 3/} -> add 4 to score | Min (F0) = 0-2 Low (F1) = 3-15 Mod (F2) = 16-23 High (F3) = 24-29 Max (F4) = 30 |
M0670 (current) | Bathing | If box 2, 3, 4, or 5, add 8to score | |
M0680 (current) | Toileting | If box 2-4, add 3 to score | |
M0690 (current) | Transferring | If box 1, add 3 to score If box 2-5, add 6 to score | |
M0700 (current) | Locomotion | If box 1 or 2, add 6 to score If box 3-5, add 9 to score |
OASIS+ Item | Description | Value | Severity Levels |
---|---|---|---|
M0175 B line 1 | No hospital discharge past14 days | If box 1 is BLANK, add 1 toscore | Min (S0) = 0-2 Low (S1) = 3 Mod (S2) = 4-6 High (S3) = 7 |
M0175 B line 2 or 3 | Inpatient rehab/SNF dischargepast 14 days | If box 2 or 3, add 2 to score | |
M0825 | Therapy threshold (10 or moretherapy [PT, OT, SLP] visits during episode) | If box 1, add 4 to score |
3.3.3Case-MixGrouper
A case-mixgrouper is used for assigning a severity level within each of theabove dimensions and for classifying the beneficiary into one of80 HHRGs. For example, the patient with high clinical severity (C3),high functional severity (F3), and moderate service utilization(S2) would be placed in the “C3F3S2” HHRG. The other HHRGs are derivedin a similar manner. The HHRG indicates the extent and severityof the beneficiary’s home health needs reflected in its relativecase-mix weight (cost weight). The case-mix weight indicates thegroup’s relative resource use and cost of treating different patients. Thestandardized prospective payment rate is multiplied by the beneficiary’sassigned HHRG case-mix weight to come up with the 60-day episodepayment.
3.3.4Therapy Hours Verification
The total case-mix adjustedepisode payment is based on elements of the OASIS data set, includingthe therapy hours or visits provided over the course of the episode.The number of therapy hours or visits projected at the start ofthe episode, entered in OASIS, will be confirmed by the hour orvisit information submitted on the claim for the episode. Thoughtherapy hours or visits are only adjusted with receipt of the claimat the end of the episode, both split percentage payments made forthe episode are case-mixed adjusted based on Grouper software runby the HHAs, often incorporated in the HAVEN software supportingOASIS. Pricer software run by the contractors processing home health claimsperform pricing, including wage index adjustments on both episodesplit percentage payments.
3.3.5HHRGUpdating
SinceOASIS - B Supplemented - provides the core data elements necessaryto classify a beneficiary into one of the 80 HHRGs, it must be updatedupon: 1) start of care; 2) resumption of care after an inpatient stay;3) follow-up or recertification for a new EOC; or 3) transfer, discharge,or death of the beneficiary. Software programs are available forcoding and validating OASIS data.
3.3.6HHRGReporting on Claim
Home healthclaims submitted for payment under PPS will be required to includea code that indicates the HHRG for the episode. However, the sixcharacter HHRG label will not be entered on the claim. Instead,a five character code called a Health Insurance Prospective PaymentSystem (HIPPS) code will be used. The HIPPS code indicates not onlythe HHRG to which the episode was assigned, but also which, if any,of the domains had OASIS items with missing or otherwise invaliddata. HIPPS codes thus represent specific patient characteristics(or case-mix) on which payment under the TRICARE Program-determinationsare made. For HHAs, a specific set of these payment codes representscase-mix groups based on research into utilization and resourceuse patterns. They are used in association with special revenuecodes used on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 1450UB-04 claim forms for institutional providers. Attached at Addendum B is a worksheet that can be usedin manually computing the HIPPS code from the original OASIS data.
3.3.6.1Composition of HIPPS Codesfor HHA PPS
3.3.6.1.1The HIPPS Code is a distinctfive position, alphanumeric code.
3.3.6.1.1.1The first position is a fixedletter “H” to designate home health, and does not correspond toany part of HHRG coding.
3.3.6.1.1.2The second, third, and fourthpositions of the code are a one-to-one crosswalk to the three domainsof the HHRG coding system. The second through fourth positions ofthe HHA PPS HIPPS code will only allow alphabetical characters.
3.3.6.1.1.3The fifth position indicateswhich elements of the code were output from the Grouper based oncomplete OASIS data, or derived by the Grouper based on a systemof defaults where OASIS data is incomplete. This position does notcorrespond to HHRGs since these codes do not differentiate paymentgroups depending on derived information. The fifth position willonly allow numeric characters. Codes with a fifth position valueother than “1” are produced from incomplete OASIS assessments notlikely to be accepted by State OASIS repositories.
3.3.6.1.1.4The HHRG to HIPPS code crosswalkis summarized in Figure 12.4-5:
(Clinical) Position#2 | (Functional) Position#3 | (Service) Position#4 | Position#5 | Domain Level |
---|---|---|---|---|
A (HHRG: C0) | E (HHRG: F0) | J (HHRG: S0) | 1 = Second, third, and fourthpositions computed | = Min |
B (HHRG: C1) | F (HHRG: F1) | K (HHRG: S1) | 2 = Second position derived | = Low |
C (HHRG: C2) | G (HHRG: F2) | L (HHRG: S2) | 3 = Third position derived | = Mod |
D (HHRG: C3) | H (HHRG: F3) | M (HHRG: S3) | 4 = Fourth position derived | = High |
I (HHRG: F4) | 5 = Second and third positionsderived | = Max | ||
6 = Third and fourth positionsderived | ||||
7 = Second and fourth positionsderived | ||||
8 = Second, third, and fourthpositions derived | ||||
N through Z | 9, 0 (expansion values forfuture use) |
3.3.6.2The 80 HHRGs are representedin the claims system by 640 HIPPS codes - eight codes for each HHRG;but only one of the eight, with a final digit of “1”, indicatesa complete data set.
3.3.6.3The eight codes of a particularHHRG have the same case-mix weight associated with them. Therefore,all eight codes for that HHRG will be priced identically by thePricer software.
3.3.6.4HIPPS codes created using thisstructure are only valid on claim lines with revenue code 023.
3.3.6.5Examples of HIPPS Codes:
•HAEJ1 would indicate a patientwhose HHRG code is minimal clinical severity, minimal functional severity,and minimal service severity. All items in all domains had validdata, so all the codes were computed.
•HCFM5 would indicate a patientwhose HHRG code is moderate clinical severity, low functional severity,and high service severity, and the codes for the functional andservice domains were derived because some of the items in each ofthose domains had responses which were invalid.
3.4GrouperLinkage of Assessment with Payment
3.4.1HHAs arerequired to assess potential patients, and re-assess existing patients,using the OASIS tool.
3.4.2Groupersoftware determines the appropriate HHRG for payment of a HHA PPS60-day episode from the results of an OASIS submission for a beneficiaryas input, or “grouped” in this software. Grouper outputs HHRGs asHIPPS coding.
3.4.3Grouperwill also output a Claims-OASIS Matching Key, linking the HIPPScode to a particular OASIS submission, and a Grouper Version Numberthat is not used in billing.
3.4.4UnderHHA PPS, both the HIPPS code and the Claims-OASIS Matching Key willbe entered on RAPs and claims.
3.5RefinedCase-Mix Model for Home Health Episodes Beginning On or After January1, 2008
This fourequation case-mix model recognizes and differentiates payment forEOCs based on whether a patient is in what is considered to be anearly (first or second episode in a sequence of adjacent episodes)or later (the third episode and beyond in a sequence of adjacentepisodes) EOC as well as recognizing whether a patient was a hightherapy (14 or more therapy visits) or low therapy (13 or fewertherapy visits) case. The refined case-mix model replaces the currentsingle therapy threshold of 10 visits with three therapy thresholds(6, 14, and 20 visits) and expands the case-mix variables to includescores for certain wound and skin conditions, additional primarydiagnosis groups such as pulmonary, cardiac and cancer diagnosesand certain secondary diagnoses. This methodology better accountsfor the higher resource use per episode and the different relationshipbetween clinical conditions and resource use that exists in laterepisodes.
3.5.1New HIPPS Code Structure UnderHH PPS Case-Mix Refinement
3.5.1.1For HH PPS episodes beginningon or after January 1, 2008, the distinct five position alphanumerichome health HIPPS is created as follows:
•The first position is no longera fixed value. The refined HH PPS uses a four equation case-mixmodel which assigns differing scores in the clinical, functionaland services domains based on whether an episode is an early orlater episode in a sequence of adjacent episodes. To reflect this,the first position in the HIPPS code is a numeric value that representsthe grouping step that applies to the three domain scores.
•The second, third, and fourthpositions of the code remain a one-to-one crosswalk to the three domainsof the HHRG coding system. The second through fourth positions ofthe HH PPS HIPPS code will only allow alphabetical characters.
•The fifth position indicatesa severity group for NRS. The HH PPS grouper software will assigneach episode into one of six NRS severity levels and create thefifth position of the HIPPS code with the values S through X. Ifthe HHA is aware that supplies were not provided during an episode,they must change this code to the corresponding number of one throughsix before submitting the claim.
•The first four positions ofthe HIPPS code submitted on the final claim must match what wason the Request for Anticipated Payment (RAP). The fifth digit mayvary (i.e., where the HHA initially anticipated the use of NRS duringthe episode only to subsequently find out that they were not required- the supply indicator may need to be changed if no supplies wereprovided).
Position #1 | Position #2 | Position #3 | Position #4 | Position #5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grouping Step | Clinical Domain | Function Domain | Service Domain | SupplyGroup - Supplies Provided | SupplyGroup - Supplies Not Provided | Domain Levels | |
Early Episodes (First & Second) | 1 (0-13 Visits) | A (HHRG: C1) | F (HHRG: F1) | K (HHRG: S1) | S (Severity Level: 1) | 1 (Severity Level: 1) | = min |
2 (14-19 Visits) | B (HHRG: C2) | G (HHRG: F2) | L (HHRG: S2) | T (Severity Level: 2) | 2 (Severity Level: 2) | = low | |
Late Episodes (Third & later) | 3 (0-13 Visits) | C (HHRG: C3) | H (HHRG: F3) | M (HHRG: S3) | U (Severity Level: 3) | 3 (Severity Level: 3) | = mod |
4 (14-19 Visits) | N (HHRG: S4) | V (Severity Level: 4) | 4 (Severity Level: 4) | = high | |||
Early or Late Episode | 5 (20 + Visits) | P (HHRG: S5) | W (Severity Level: 5) | 5 (Severity Level: 5) | = max | ||
X (Severity Level: 6) | 6 (Severity Level: 6) | ||||||
6 thru 0 | D thru E | I thru J | Q thru R | Y thru Z | 7 thru 0 | Expansion values for futureuse |
3.5.1.2Examples of HIPPS coding structurebased on Figure 12.4-6:
•First episode, 10 therapy visits,with lowest scores in the clinical, functional and service domains andlowest supply severity level = HIPPS code 1AFKS.
•Third episode, 16 therapy visits,moderate scores in the clinical, functional and service domainsand supply severity level 3 = HIPPS code 4CHMV.
•Third episode, 22 therapy visits,clinical domain score is low, function domain score is moderate, servicedomain score is high and supply severity level 4, but supplies werenot provided due to a special circ*mstance = HIPPS code 5BHN4.
3.5.1.3Each HIPPS code representsa distinct payment amount, without any duplication of payment weightsacross codes.
3.5.1.4The new HIPPS coding structurehas resulted in 153 case-mix groups represented by the first fourpositions of the code. Each of these case-mix groups can be combinedwith a NRS severity level, resulting in 918 HIPPS codes in all (i.e.,153 case-mix times six NRS severity levels). With two values representingsupply levels (1-6 in cases where NRS’s are not associated withthe first four positions of the HIPPS code and S-X where they are),there are actually 1836 new HIPPS codes. Refer to the DHA web site(http://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Business-Support/Rates-and-Reimbursem*nt)for a complete listing of HH PPS case-mix refined HIPPS codes (allfive positions) with associated weights.
3.5.2Constructing of HIPPS Codesfrom Grouping Step and Point Scores
The following scoring matrix(Figure 12.4-7)will be used in construction of the HIPPS code for payment underHH PPS:
Level | First& Second Episodes | Third+ Episodes | All Episodes | HIPPSCode | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-13 Therapy Visits | 14-19 Therapy Visits | 0-13 Therapy Visits | 14-19 Therapy Visits | 20 + Therapy Visits | Level | HIPPS Values | HIPPS Position | ||
Note:If anepisode has 20 or more visits, the case mix points could come fromthe second leg if it is an early episode, and from the fourth legif it is a later episode. The table column headers indicate thatthese two legs are for 14 or more therapy visits. | |||||||||
Grouping Step: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Step: | 1-5 | 1 | |
Clinical Severity Level: (by point scores-Figure 12.4-8) | C1 | 0 to 4 | 0 to 6 | 0 to 2 | 0 to 8 | 0 to 7 | C1 | A | 2 |
C2 | 5 to 8 | 7 to 14 | 3 to 5 | 9 to 16 | 8 to 14 | C2 | B | ||
C3 | 9+ | 15+ | 6+ | 17+ | 15+ | C3 | C | ||
Functional Severity Level: (by point scores-Figure 12.4-8) | F1 | 0 to 5 | 0 to 6 | 0 to 8 | 0 to 7 | 0 to 6 | F1 | F | 3 |
F2 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | F2 | G | ||
F3 | 7+ | 8+ | 10+ | 9+ | 8+ | F3 | H | ||
Services Utilization Level: (by number of therapy visits) | S1 | 0 to 5 | 14 to 15 | 0 to 5 | 14 to 15 | 20+ (1 Group) | S1 | K | 4 |
S2 | 6 | 16 to 17 | 6 | 16 to 17 | S2 | L | |||
S3 | 7 to 9 | 18 to 19 | 7 to 9 | 18 to 19 | S3 | M | |||
S4 | 10 | 10 | S4 | N | |||||
S5 | 11 to 13 | 11 to 13 | S5 | P | |||||
NRS - Supplies SeverityLevel: (by NRS point scores-Figure 12.4-10) | NRS-1 | NRS-1 | S | 5 | |||||
NRS-2 | 1 to 14 | NRS-2 | T | ||||||
NRS-3 | 15 to 27 | NRS-3 | U | ||||||
NRS-4 | 28 to 48 | NRS-4 | V | ||||||
NRS-5 | 49 to 98 | NRS-5 | W | ||||||
NRS-6 | 99+ | NRS-6 | X |
3.5.2.1Case-mix adjustment variablesand scores used in constructing HIPPS codes (i.e., point scoringused in Figure 12.4-6 for determining the appropriateHIPPS code for payment).
3.5.2.1.1The point scores for clinicaland functional severity levels (second and third positions of HIPPScode) are derived from Figure 12.4-8 which gives a description ofeach diagnosis group followed by four columns representing the fourlegs of the four-equation model.
Episode number withinsequence of adjacent episodes | 1 or 2 | 1 or 2 | 3+ | 3+ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Therapy visits | 0-13 | 14+ | 0-13 | 14+ | |
EQUATION: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
Clinical Dimension | |||||
1 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Blindness/Low Vision | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
2 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Blood disorders | 2 | 5 | ||
3 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Cancer, selected benign neoplasms | 4 | 7 | 3 | 10 |
4 | Primary Diagnosis = Diabetes | 5 | 12 | 1 | 8 |
5 | Other Diagnosis = Diabetes | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
6 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Dysphagia AND Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke | 2 | 6 | 6 | |
7 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Dysphagia AND M0250 (Therapy at home) = 3(Enteral) | 6 | |||
8 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
9 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders AND M0550 (ostomy) = 1 or 2 | 3 | |||
10 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders AND Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis, OR Neuro 2 - Peripheralneurological disorders, OR Neuro 3 - Stroke, OR Neuro 4 - MultipleSclerosis | 2 | |||
11 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Heart Disease OR Hypertension | 3 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
12 | Primary Diagnosis = Neuro 1- Brain disorders and paralysis | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
13 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis AND M0680 (Toileting) = 2 or more | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
14 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis OR Neuro 2 - Peripheralneurological disorders AND M0650 or M0660 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
15 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke | 1 | |||
16 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke AND M0650 or M0660 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
17 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke AND M0700 (Ambulation) = 3 or more | 1 | 5 | ||
18 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 4 - Multiple Sclerosis AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: M0670 (bathing) = 2 or more OR M0680 (Toileting) = 2 or more OR M0690 (Transferring) = 2 ormore OR M0700 (Ambulation) = 3 or more | 3 | 3 | 12 | 18 |
19 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Ortho 1 - Leg Disorders or Gait Disorders AND M0460 (most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 1, 2, 3 or 4 | 2 | |||
20 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Ortho 1 - Leg OR Ortho 2 - Other orthopedic disorders AND M0250 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 5 | 5 | ||
21 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Psych 1 – Affective and other psychoses, depression | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
22 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Psych 2 - Degenerative and other organic psychiatric disorders | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
23 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Pulmonary disorders | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
24 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Pulmonary disorders AND M0700 (Ambulation) = 1 or more | 1 | |||
25 | Primary Diagnosis = Skin 1-Traumatic wounds, burns, and post-operative complications | 10 | 20 | 8 | 20 |
26 | Other Diagnosis = Skin 1 -Traumatic wounds, burns, post-operative complications | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
27 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Skin 1 -Traumatic wounds, burns, and post-operative complicationsOR Skin 2 – Ulcers and other skin conditions AND M0250 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 2 | 2 | ||
28 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Skin 2 - Ulcers and other skin conditions | 6 | 12 | 5 | 12 |
29 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Tracheostomy | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
30 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Urostomy/Cystostomy | 6 | 23 | 4 | 23 |
31 | M0250 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 8 | 15 | 5 | 12 |
32 | M0250 (Therapy at home) = 3(Enteral) | 4 | 12 | 12 | |
33 | M0390 (Vision) = 1 or more | 1 | 1 | ||
34 | M0420 (Pain) = 2 or 3 | 1 | |||
35 | M0450 = Two or more pressureulcers at stage 3 or 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
36 | M0460 (Most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 1 or 2 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 11 |
37 | M0460 (Most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 3 or 4 | 16 | 26 | 12 | 23 |
38 | M0476 (Stasis ulcer status)= 2 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
39 | M0476 (Stasis ulcer status)= 3 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
40 | M0488 (Surgical wound status)= 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
41 | M0488 (Surgical wound status)= 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
42 | M0490 (Dyspnea) = 2, 3, or4 | 2 | 2 | ||
43 | M0540 (Bowel Incontinence)= 2 to 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
44 | M0550 (Ostomy) = 1 or 2 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
45 | M0800 (Injectable Drug Use)= 0, 1, or 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
FunctionalDimension | |||||
46 | M0650 or M0660 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
47 | M0670 (Bathing) = 2 or more | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
48 | M0680 (Toileting) = 2 or more | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
49 | M0690 (Transferring) = 2 ormore | 2 | |||
50 | M0700 (Ambulation) = 1 or 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
51 | M0700 (Ambulation) = 3 or more | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
Note:The datafor the regression equations come from a 20% random sample of episodesfrom CY 2005. The sample excludes LUPA episodes, outlier episodes,and episodes with SCIC or PEP adjustments. Points are additive; however,points may not be given for the same line item in the table morethan once. Please see Medicare Home HealthDiagnosis Coding guidance at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HomeHealthPPS/index.html fordefinitions of primary and secondary diagnoses. |
Note:4-Equation Model was Estimatedon Episodes from 2005 where 401.1 and 401.9 were not counted inthe Hypertension Diagnosis Group. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Episode number withinsequence of adjacent episodes | 1 or 2 | 1 or 2 | 3+ | 3+ | |
Therapy visits | 0-13 | 14+ | 0-13 | 14+ | |
EQUATION: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
ClinicalDimension | |||||
1 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Blindness/Low Vision | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
2 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Blood disorders | 2 | 5 | ||
3 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Cancer, selected benign neoplasms | 3 | 8 | 3 | 10 |
4 | Primary Diagnosis = Diabetes | 5 | 13 | 1 | 8 |
5 | Other Diagnosis = Diabetes | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
6 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Dysphagia AND Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke | 2 | 6 | 6 | |
7 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Dysphagia AND M1030 (Therapy at home) = 3(Enteral) | 6 | |||
8 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
9 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders AND M1630 (ostomy) = 1 or 2 | 2 | |||
10 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Gastrointestinal disorders AND Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis, OR Neuro 2 - Peripheralneurological disorders, OR Neuro 3 - Stroke, OR Neuro 4 - MultipleSclerosis | 2 | |||
11 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Heart Disease OR Hypertension | 3 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
12 | Primary Diagnosis = Neuro 1- Brain disorders and paralysis | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
13 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis AND M1840 (Toileting) = 2 or more | 3 | 10 | 3 | 10 |
14 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 1 - Brain disorders and paralysis OR Neuro 2 - Peripheralneurological disorders AND M1810 or M1820 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
15 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke | 2 | |||
16 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke AND M1810 or M1820 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
17 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 3 - Stroke AND M1860 (Ambulation) = 4 or more | 1 | 5 | ||
18 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Neuro 4 - Multiple Sclerosis AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: M1830 (bathing) = 2 or more OR M1840 (Toileting) = 2 or more OR M1850 (Transferring) = 2 ormore OR M1860 (Ambulation) = 4 or more | 3 | 3 | 12 | 18 |
19 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Ortho 1 - Leg Disorders or Gait Disorders AND M1324 (most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 1, 2, 3, or 4 | 2 | |||
20 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Ortho 1 - Leg OR Ortho 2 - Other orthopedic disorders AND M1030 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 5 | 5 | ||
21 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Psych 1 - Affective and other psychoses, depression | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
22 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Psych 2 - Degenerative and other organic psychiatric disorders | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
23 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Pulmonary disorders | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
24 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Pulmonary disorders AND M1860 (Ambulation) = 1 or more | 1 | |||
25 | Primary Diagnosis = Skin 1-Traumatic wounds, burns, and post-operative complications | 10 | 20 | 8 | 20 |
26 | Other Diagnosis = Skin 1 -Traumatic wounds, burns, post-operative complications | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
27 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Skin 1 -Traumatic wounds, burns, and post-operative complicationsOR Skin 2 - Ulcers and other skin conditions AND M1030 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 2 | 2 | ||
28 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Skin 2 - Ulcers and other skin conditions | 6 | 12 | 5 | 12 |
29 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Tracheostomy | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
30 | Primary or Other Diagnosis= Urostomy/Cystostomy | 6 | 22 | 4 | 22 |
31 | M1030 (Therapy at home) = 1(IV/Infusion) or 2 (Parenteral) | 8 | 15 | 5 | 11 |
32 | M1030 (Therapy at home) = 3(Enteral) | 4 | 11 | 11 | |
33 | M1200 (Vision) = 1 or more | 1 | 2 | ||
34 | M1242 (Pain) = 3 or 4 | 1 | |||
35 | M1308 = Two or more pressureulcers at stage 3 or 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
36 | M1324 (Most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 1 or 2 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 11 |
37 | M1324 (Most problematic pressureulcer stage) = 3 or 4 | 16 | 26 | 12 | 22 |
38 | M1334 (Stasis ulcer status)= 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
39 | M1334 (Stasis ulcer status)= 3 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
40 | M1342 (Surgical wound status)= 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
41 | M1342 (Surgical wound status)= 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
42 | M1400 (Dyspnea) = 2, 3, or4 | 2 | 2 | ||
43 | M1620 (Bowel Incontinence)= 2 to 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
44 | M1630 (Ostomy) = 1 or 2 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 9 |
45 | M2030 (Injectable Drug Use)= 0, 1, 2, or 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
FunctionalDimension | |||||
46 | M1810 or M1820 (Dressing upperor lower body) = 1, 2, or 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
47 | M1830 (Bathing) = 2 or more | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
48 | M1840 (Toileting) = 2 or more | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
49 | M1850 (Transferring) = 2 ormore | 1 | |||
50 | M1860 (Ambulation) = 1, 2,or 3 | 1 | 1 | ||
51 | M1860 (Ambulation) = 4 or more | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Note:The datafor the regression equations come from a 20% random sample of episodesfrom CY 2005. The sample excludes LUPA episodes, outlier episodes,and episodes with SCIC or PEP adjustments. Points are additive; however,points may not be given for the same line item in the table morethan once. Please see Medicare Home HealthDiagnosis Coding guidance at for https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HomeHealthPPS/index.html definitionsof primary and secondary diagnoses. |
3.5.2.2The point scores for serviceutilization levels (fourth position of the HIPPS code) are determinedby the number of therapy visits (see Figure 12.4-7 for range ofvisits within each service utilization level and associated episode).
3.5.2.3The point scores for NRS levels(fifth position of the HIPPS code) are derived from the six severitygroups in Figure 12.4-10. These severity levels moreaccurately reflect the large variation in NRS used across all patienttypes.
Severity Level | Points (Scoring) | Relative Weight | Payment Amount |
---|---|---|---|
Note:NRS conversionfactor = $52.35. | |||
1 | 0.2698 | $ 14.12 | |
2 | 1 to 14 | 0.9742 | 51.00 |
3 | 15 to 27 | 2.6712 | 139.84 |
4 | 28 to 48 | 3.9686 | 207.76 |
5 | 49 to 98 | 6.1198 | 320.37 |
6 | 99+ | 10.5254 | 551.00 |
3.5.2.3.1Figure 12.4-11 provides thecase-mix variables (i.e., selected skin conditions and other clinicalfactors) and scores used in assigning a NRS to one of the six severitylevels in Figure 12.4-10.
Item | Description | Score |
---|---|---|
SelectedSkin Conditions: | ||
1 | Primary diagnosis = Anal fissure,fistula and abscess | 15 |
2 | Other diagnosis = Anal fissure,fistula and abscess | 13 |
3 | Primary diagnosis = Cellulitisand abscess | 14 |
4 | Other diagnosis = Cellulitisand abscess | 8 |
5 | Primary diagnosis = Diabeticulcers | 20 |
6 | Primary diagnosis = Gangrene | 11 |
7 | Other diagnosis = Gangrene | 8 |
8 | Primary diagnosis = Malignantneoplasms of skin | 15 |
9 | Other diagnosis = Malignantneoplasms of skin | 4 |
10 | Primary or Other diagnosis= Non-pressure and non-stasis ulcers | 13 |
11 | Primary diagnosis = Other infectionsof skin and subcutaneous tissue | 16 |
12 | Other diagnosis = Other infectionsof skin and subcutaneous tissue | 7 |
13 | Primary diagnosis = Post-operativeComplications | 23 |
14 | Other diagnosis = Post-operativeComplications | 15 |
15 | Primary diagnosis = TraumaticWounds and Burns | 19 |
16 | Other diagnosis = TraumaticWounds and Burns | 8 |
17 | Primary or other diagnosis= V code, Cystostomy care | 16 |
18 | Primary or other diagnosis= V code, Tracheostomy care | 23 |
19 | Primary or other diagnosis= V code, Urostomy care | 24 |
20 | OASIS M0450 = 1 or 2 pressureulcers, stage 1 | 4 |
21 | OASIS M0450 = 3+ pressure ulcers,stage 1 | 6 |
22 | OASIS M0450 = 1 pressure ulcer,stage 2 | 14 |
23 | OASIS M0450 = 2 pressure ulcers,stage 2 | 22 |
24 | OASIS M0450 = 3 pressure ulcers,stage 2 | 29 |
25 | OASIS M0450 = 4+ pressure ulcers,stage 2 | 35 |
26 | OASIS M0450 = 1 pressure ulcer,stage 3 | 29 |
27 | OASIS M0450 = 2 pressure ulcers,stage 3 | 41 |
28 | OASIS M0450 = 3 pressure ulcers,stage 3 | 46 |
29 | OASIS M0450 = 4+ pressure ulcers,stage 3 | 58 |
30 | OASIS M0450 = 1 pressure ulcer,stage 4 | 48 |
31 | OASIS M0450 = 2 pressure ulcers,stage 4 | 67 |
32 | OASIS M0450 = 3+ pressure ulcers,stage 4 | 75 |
33 | OASIS M0450e = 1 (unobservedpressure ulcer(s)) | 17 |
34 | OASIS M0470 = 2 (2 stasis ulcers) | 6 |
35 | OASIS M0470 = 3 (3 stasis ulcers) | 12 |
36 | OASIS M0470 = 4 (4+ stasisulcers) | 21 |
37 | OASIS M0474 = 1 (unobservablestasis ulcers) | 9 |
38 | OASIS M0476 = 1 (status ofmost problematic stasis ulcer: fully granulating) | 6 |
39 | OASIS M0476 = 2 (status ofmost problematic stasis ulcer: early/partial granulation) | 25 |
40 | OASIS M0476 = 3 (status ofmost problematic stasis ulcer: not healing) | 36 |
41 | OASIS M0488 = 2 (status ofmost problematic surgical wound: early/partial granulation) | 4 |
42 | OASIS M0488 = 3 (status ofmost problematic surgical wound: not healing) | 14 |
OtherClinical Factors: | ||
43 | OASIS M0550 = 1 (ostomy notrelated to inpt stay/no regimen change) | 27 |
44 | OASIS M0550 = 2 (ostomy relatedto inpt stay/regimen change) | 45 |
45 | Any “Selected Skin Conditions”(rows 1-42 above) AND M0550 = 1 (ostomy not related to inpt stay/noregimen change) | 14 |
46 | Any “Selected Skin Conditions”(rows 1-42 above) AND M0550 = 2 (ostomy related to inpt stay/ regimenchange) | 11 |
47 | OASIS M0250 (Therapy at home)= 1 (IV/Infusion) | 5 |
48 | OASIS M0520 = 2 (patient requiresurinary catheter) | 9 |
49 | OASIS M0540 = 4 or 5 (bowelincontinence, daily or > daily) | 10 |
Note:Pointsare additive; however, points may not be given for the same lineitem in the table more than once. Points are not assigned fora secondary diagnosis if points are already assigned for a primarydiagnosis from the same diagnosis /condition group. Please see Medicare Home HealthDiagnosis Coding guidance at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HomeHealthPPS/index.html fordefinitions of primary and secondary diagnoses. |
3.5.2.3.2The supply payment amountsderived from the above severity level matrix (Figure 12.4-10) will be includedin the total payment returned by the HH Pricer. It will not be reflectedseparately on the claim. Supply amounts will not be calculated onLUPA claims.
3.5.2.3.3Refer to the CMS website (http://www.cms.gov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/homehealthpps/casemixgroupersoftware.html)for the diagnoses included in the diagnostic categories for theNRS case-mix adjustment model (Figure 12.4-11).
3.5.2.3.4NRS provided during an EOCare subject to consolidated billing. If the date of service forNRS falls within the dates of an EOC, payment for the NRS is denied.However, NRS claims may be submitted by suppliers on the professionalclaim format, which has both “from” and “to” dates on each item.Medicare has instructed suppliers to report the delivery date asthe “from” date, and the date by which the supplies will be usedin the “to” date. When this causes the “to” date on a supply lineitem subject to consolidated billing to overlap on EOC, the servicemay be denied incorrectly. Contractors shall ensure proper paymentof NRS provided prior to the beginning of an EOC (“from” date priorto the beginning of an EOC), even if the “to” date overlaps theEOC.
3.5.3Adjustmentof HIPPS Code for Incorrect Episode Designation
The contractors’ claims processingsystem shall perform re-coding of claims where the HIPPS code does notreflect the correct episode using the 18-position treatment authorizationcode (formally known as the claim-OASIS matching key code) reportedin Form Locator (FL) 63 of the UB-04 (CMS Form 1450).
3.5.3.1Following is the new formatof the treatment authorization code for episodes beginning on orafter January 1, 2008:
Position | Definition | Format |
---|---|---|
1-2 | M0030 (Start-of-care date)- 2 digit year | 99 |
3-4 | M0030 (Start-of-care date)- alpha code for Julian date | XX |
5-6 | M0090 (Date assessment completed)- 2 digit year | 99 |
7-8 | M0090 (Date assessment completed)- alpha code for Julian Date | XX |
9 | M0100 (Reason for assessment) | 9 |
10 | M0110 (Episode Timing) - Early=1,Late=2 | 9 |
11 | Alpha code for Clinical severitypoints - under Equation 1 | X |
12 | Alpha code for Functional severitypoints - under Equation 1 | X |
13 | Alpha code for Clinical severitypoints - under Equation 2 | X |
14 | Alpha code for Functional severitypoints - under Equation 2 | X |
15 | Alpha code for Clinical severitypoints - under Equation 3 | X |
16 | Alpha code for Functional severitypoints - under Equation 3 | X |
17 | Alpha code for Clinical severitypoints - under Equation 4 | X |
18 | Alpha code for Functional severitypoints - under Equation 4 | X |
3.5.3.1.1The Julian dates in positions3-4 and 7-8 are converted from three position numeric values totwo position alphabetic values using the code system in Addendum E.
3.5.3.1.2The two position numeric scoresin positions 11-18 are converted to a single alphabetic code usingvalues in Figure 12.4-13.
Points | LetterCode | Points | LetterCode | Points | LetterCode | Points | Letter Code | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 or 1 | A | 8 | H | 15 | O | 22 | V | |||
2 | B | 9 | I | 16 | P | 23 | W | |||
3 | C | 10 | J | 17 | Q | 24 | X | |||
4 | D | 11 | K | 18 | R | 25 | Y | |||
5 | E | 12 | L | 19 | S | 26 | Z | |||
6 | F | 13 | M | 20 | T | |||||
7 | G | 14 | N | 21 | U |
3.5.3.2Figure 12.4-14 provides anexample of a treatment authorization code that is created by the groupersoftware using the format outlined in Figure 12.4-13.
Position | Definition | Actual Value | Resulting Code |
---|---|---|---|
1-2 | M0030 (Start-of-care date)- two digit year | 2007 | 07 |
3-4 | M0030 (Start-of-care date)- alpha code for Julian date | Julian date 245 | JK |
5-6 | M0090 (Date assessment completed)- two digit year | 2008 | 08 |
7-8 | M0090 (Date assessment completed)- alpha code for Julian date | Julian date 001 | AA |
9 | M0100 (Reason for assessment) | 04 | 4 |
10 | M0110 (Episode Timing) - Early= 1, Late = 2 | 01 | 1 |
11 | Clinical severity points -under Equation 1 | 7 | G |
12 | Functional severity points- under Equation 1 | 2 | B |
13 | Clinical severity points -under Equation 2 | 13 | M |
14 | Functional severity points- under Equation 2 | 4 | D |
15 | Clinical severity points -under Equation 3 | 3 | C |
16 | Functional severity points- under Equation 3 | 4 | D |
17 | Clinical severity points -under Equation 4 | 12 | L |
18 | Functional severity points- under Equation 4 | 7 | G |
The treatment authorizationcode that would appear on the claim would be, in this example: 07JK08AA41GBMDCDLG
3.5.3.3Episode adjustment processusing authorization code.
3.5.3.3.1Contractor claims processingsystems shall validate the treatment authorization code except wherecondition code 21 is present on the claim. If the code is validated,the contractors will return claims to the provider if the treatmentauthorization code fails any of the following validation edits:
•The first, second, fifth, sixth,and ninth positions of the treatment authorization codes must be numeric;
•The third, fourth, seventh,and eighth positions of the code must be alphabetic;
•The tenth position of the codemust contain a value of one or two; and
•The eleventh through 18th positionsof the code must be alphabetic.
3.5.3.3.2The system shall read the homehealth episode history when a new episode is received and identifyany HIPPS codes that represent an incorrect position in the sequence.The sequence of episodes are determined without regard to changesin the HHA. The calculated 60-day episode end date will be usedto measure breaks between episodes in all cases except for episodessubject to PEP adjustments. In the case of PEP episodes, the dateof latest billing will be used.
3.5.3.3.3If the contractors’ systemidentifies a HIPPS code that represents an incorrect position inthe sequence of episodes it shall be re-coded and adjusted usingthe last nine positions of the treatment authorization code andthe following re-coding logic:
3.5.3.3.3.1The last eight positions ofthe treatment authorization will contain codes representing thepoints for the clinical domain and the functional domain as calculatedunder each of the four equations of the refined HH PPS case mixsystem. The treatment authorization code, including these domaincodes, will be calculated by the HH PPS Grouper software, so thatproviders can transfer this 18 position code to their claims.
3.5.3.3.3.2The input/output record forthe HH Pricer will be modified to convert existing filler fieldsinto new fields to facilitate recording. A new nine position fieldwill be created to carry the clinical and functional severity pointinformation. The last nine positions of the treatment authorizationcode will be extracted and placed into this new field in the input/outputrecord. This will enable the HH Pricer to record claims using thepoint information.
3.5.3.3.3.3On incoming original RAPs andclaims, the HH Pricer will disregard the code in this nine positionfield, since the submitted HIPPS code is being priced at face value.The code in this nine position field will be used in recording claimsidentified as misrepresenting the episode sequence. To enable thePricer to distinguish these two cases, an additional one positionnumeric field will be added to the input/output record.
3.5.3.3.3.4On the original RAPs and claims,the system will populate the new one position field with a zero.
•If a claim is submitted bythe provider as a first or second episode and the claim is actuallya third or later episode, the system shall populate the new fieldwith a 3 to indicate this.
•If a claim is submitted bythe provider as a third or later episode and the claim is actuallya first or second episode, the system shall populate the new fieldwith a 1 to indicate this.
3.5.3.3.3.5When the new one position fieldis populated with a 1 or a 3, the HH Pricer will record the claimusing the following steps:
Step 1:The HHPricer will determine, from the new episode sequence and the numberof therapy visits on the claim, which equation of the HH PPS case-mixmodel applies to the claim.
Step 2:The HH Pricer will find thetwo positions in the new nine position field that correspond tothe equation identified in Step 1.
Step 3:The HH Pricer will convertthe alphabetic codes in these positions to numeric point values.
Step 4:The HH Pricer will read theappropriate column on the case-mix scoring table to find the newclinical and functional severity levels that correspond to thatpoint value (Figure 12.4-8).
Step 5:Using the severity levels identifiedin Step 4 and the HIPPS code structure shown in the above table,the HH Pricer will determine the new HIPPS code that applies tothe claim.
3.5.3.3.3.6The HH Pricer will use thenew HIPPS code resulting from these steps to re-price the claimand will return the new code to the existing output HIPPS code fieldin the input/output record.
3.5.3.3.3.7When the first position ofthe HIPPS code is a five and the number of therapy services on theclaim are less than 20, the HH Pricer will use the first positionof the new nine position field to record the first position of theHIPPS code and complete the steps described above.
3.5.3.4Adjustment of previously paidepisodes.
3.5.3.4.1The contractor claims processingsystems shall initiate automatic adjustments for previously paidepisodes when the receipt of earlier dated episodes change theirposition in a sequence of episodes. The system shall re-code andre-price the automatic adjustments.
3.5.3.4.2The system shall calculatea supply adjustment amount and add it to the otherwise re-pricedepisode amount.
3.5.3.5Determining the gap betweenepisodes (i.e., if the episodes are adjacent/contiguous.
3.5.3.5.1The 60-day period to determinea gap that will begin a new sequence of episodes will be countedin most instances from the calculated 60-day end date of the episode.The exception to this is for episodes that were subject to PEP adjustment.
3.5.3.5.2In PEP cases, the system shallcount 60 days from the date of the last billable home health visitprovided in the PEP episode.
3.5.3.5.3Intervening stays in inpatientfacilities will not create any special consideration in countingthe 60-day gap.
•If an inpatient stay occurredwithin an episode, it would not be a part of the gap, as countingwould not begin at Day 60, which in this case could be later thanthe inpatient discharge date.
•If an inpatient stay occurredwithin the period after the end of all HH episode and before the beginningof the next one, those days would be counted as part of the gapjust as any other days would.
3.5.3.5.4If episodes are received aftera particular claim is paid that change the sequence initially assignedto the paid episode (for example, by service dates falling earlierthan those of the paid episode, or by falling within a gap betweenpaid episodes), the system will initiate automatic adjustments tocorrect the payment of any necessary episodes as described above.
3.5.3.6Refer to Section 7 forinput/output record layout and Pricer logic for reimbursem*nt ofHH services.
3.6AbbreviatedAssessments for Establishment of Payments Under HHA PPS
3.6.1Medicare-certified HHAs willbe required to conduct abbreviated assessments for TRICARE Programbeneficiaries who are under the age of 18 or receiving maternitycare for payment under the HHA PPS. This will require the manualcompletion and scoring of a HHRG Worksheet (refer to Addendum B forcopy of worksheet). The HIPPS code generated from this scoring processwill be submitted on the CMS 1450 UB-04 for pricing and payment.This abbreviated 23 item assessment (as opposed to the full 79 itemcomprehensive assessment) will provide the minimal amount of data necessaryfor reimbursem*nt under the HHA PPS. This is preferable, from anintegrity standpoint, to dummying up the missing data elements onthe comprehensive assessment. HHAs will also be responsible forcollecting the OASIS data element links necessary in reporting theclaims-OASIS matching key (i.e., the 18 position code, containingthe start of care date (eight positions, from OASIS item M0030),the date the assessment was completed (eight-positions, from OASISitem M0090), and the reason for assessment (two positions, fromOASIS item M0100). The claims-OASIS matching key is reported inFL 44 of the CMS 1450 UB-04.
3.6.2Use ofAbbreviated Assessments for Episodes Beginning On or After January1, 2008. Abbreviated assessments will continue to be used for TRICAREProgram beneficiaries who are under the age of 18 or receiving maternitycare for payment under the HHA PPS with the following modifications:
3.6.2.1The first position of the HIPPScode - which assigns differing scores in the clinical, functional andservices domains based on whether an episode is an early or laterepisode in a sequence of adjacent episodes and the number of visitsincurred during that episode - will be reported by the HHA in accordancewith the HIPPS coding structure outlined in Figure 12.4-6 (i.e., numericalvalues 1 through 5 based on the EOC and number of visits).
3.6.2.2The second, third, and fourthpositions of the HIPPS code (alphabetical characters) will be assignedbased on the scoring of the 23 OASIS items reflected in the HHRGWorksheet for episodes beginning on or after January 1, 2008 in Addendum B. The OASIS items for use in thisabbreviated assessment scoring will be available on the CMS website at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HomeHealthQualityInits/index.html.However, since Clinical Severity Domain category C0,Function Status Domain category F0, and Service Utilization Domaincategory S0 are no longer recognized as part of therefined HIPPS coding structure they will default to C1, F1,and S1, respectively, in establishing reimbursem*ntunder the abbreviated assessment for TRICARE Program beneficiarieswho are under the age of 18 or receiving maternity care.
3.6.2.3The fifth position of the HIPPScode will be reported by the HHA using the HIPPS coding structureoutlined in Figure 12.4-6 based on the EOC and numberof visits, along with whether or not supplies were actually providedduring the episode of HHC; i.e., 1-6 in cases where NRSs are not associatedwith the first four positions of the HIPPS code and S-X where theyare.
3.6.2.4A treatment authorization codewill not be required for the processing and payment of home healthepisodes under the abbreviated assessment process. As a result,the contractors shall not have the responsibility of recoding claimsand/or validating the 18-position treatment authorization code thatis normally required for the processing and payment of home healthclaims subject to the full-blown OASIS assessment.
3.6.3The following hierarchy willbe adhered to in the placement and reimbursem*nt of home healthservices for TRICARE eligible beneficiaries under the age of 18or receiving maternity care. The contractors shall adhere to thishierarchical placement through their role in establishing primary providerstatus under the HHA PPS (i.e., designating that HHA which may receivepayment under the consolidated billing provisions for home healthservices provided under a POC).
3.6.3.1Authorization for care in andprimary provider status designation for a Medicare certified HHA(i.e., in a HHA meeting all Medicare conditions of participation[Sections 1861(o) and 1891 of the Social Security Act and part 484of the Medicare regulation (42 CFR 484)] will result in paymentof home health services under the PPS. The HHA will be reimburseda fixed case-mix and wage-adjusted 60-day episode payment amountbased on the HIPPS code generated from the required abbreviated assessment.For example, if there are two HHAs within a given treatment areathat can provide care for a TRICARE Program beneficiary under theage of 18, and one is Medicare certified and the other is not dueto its targeted patient population (HHA specializing solely in thehome health needs of patients under the age of 18), the contractorwill authorize care in, and designate primary provider status to,the Medicare HHA.
3.6.3.2Ifa Medicare-certified HHA is not available within the service area,the contractor may authorize care in a non-Medicare certified HHA(e.g., a HHA which has not sought Medicare certification/approvaldue to the specialized beneficiary categories it services - patientsreceiving maternity care and/or patients under the age 18) thatqualifies for corporate services provider status under the TRICAREProgram (refer to the TRICARE Policy Manual (TPM), Chapter 11, Section 12.1, for the specificqualifying criteria for granting corporate services provider statusunder the TRICARE Program.) The following payment provisions willapply to HHAs qualifying for coverage under the corporate servicesprovider class:
3.6.3.2.1Otherwise covered professionalservices provided by TRICARE authorized individual providers employedby or under contract with a freestanding corporate entity will bepaid under the CHAMPUS Maximum Allowable Charge (CMAC) reimbursem*ntsystem, subject to any restrictions and limitations as may be prescribedunder existing TRICARE policy.
3.6.3.2.2Payment will also be allowedfor supplies used by a TRICARE Program authorized individual provideremployed by or contracted with a corporate services provider inthe direct treatment of a TRICARE eligible beneficiary. Allowablesupplies will be reimbursed in accordance with the allowable chargemethodology as described in Chapter 5.
3.6.3.2.3Reimbursem*nt of covered professionalservices and supplies will be made directly to the TRICARE authorizedcorporate services provider under its own tax identification number.
3.6.3.2.4There are also regulatory andcontractual provisions currently in place that grant contractorsthe authority to establish alternative network reimbursem*nt systemsas long as they do not exceed what would have otherwise been allowedunder TRICARE payment methodologies.
3.7Split Payments (Initial andFinal Payments)
A splitpercentage approach has been taken in the payment of HHAs in orderto minimize potential cash-flow problems.
3.7.1A splitpercentage payment will be made for most episode periods. Therewill be two payments (initial and final) - the initial paid in responseto a RAP, and the final in response to a claim. Added together,the initial and final payments equal 100% of the permissible reimbursem*ntfor the episode.
3.7.2Therewill be a difference in the percentage split of initial and finalpayments for initial and subsequent episodes for patients in continuouscare. For all initial episodes, the percentage split for the twopayments will be 60% in response to the RAP, and 40% in responseto the claim. For all subsequent episodes in periods of continuouscare, each of the two percentage payments will equal 50% of the estimatedcase-mix adjusted episode payment. There is no set length requiredfor a gap in services between episodes for a following episode tobe considered initial rather than subsequent. If any gap occurs,the next episode will be considered initial for payment purposes.
3.7.3The HHA may request and receiveaccelerated payment if the contractor fails to make timely payments.While a physician’s signature is not required on the POC for initialpayment, it is required prior to claim submission for final payment.
3.8Calculation of ProspectivePayment Amounts
3.8.1National 60-Day Episode PaymentAmounts
3.8.1.1Medicare, in establishmentof its prospective payment amount, included all costs of home healthservices derived from audited Medicare cost reports for a nationallyrepresentative sample of HHAs for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997. Base-yearcosts were adjusted using the latest available market basket increasesbetween the cost reporting periods contained in the database andSeptember 30, 2001. Total costs were divided by total visits inestablishing an average cost per visit per discipline. The discipline specificcost per visit was then multiplied by the average number of visitsper discipline provided within a 60-day EOC in the establishmentof a home health prospective payment rate per discipline. The 60-dayutilization rates were derived from Medicare home health claimsdata for FY 1997 and 1998. The prospective payment rates for allsix disciplines were summed to arrive at a total non-standardized prospectivepayment amount per 60-day EOC.
3.8.1.2Figure 12.4-15 provides thecalculations involved in the establishment of the non-standardizedprospective payment amount per 60-day episode in FY 2001, alongwith adjustments for NRS, Part B therapies and OASIS implementationand ongoing costs.
Disciplines | Total Costs | TotalVISITS | Average Cost Per Visit | Aver.# Visits per 60-days | Home Health Prospective PaymentRate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Home Health Aide Services | $5,915,395,602 | 141,682,907 | $41.75 | 13.40 | $559.45 | |||||
Medical Social Services | 458,571,353 | 2,985,588 | 153.59 | 0.32 | 49.15 | |||||
Occupational Therapy | 444,691,130 | 4,244,901 | 104.76 | 0.53 | 55.52 | |||||
Physical Therapy | 2,456,109,303 | 23,605,011 | 104.05 | 3.05 | 317.35 | |||||
Skilled Nursing Services | 12,108,884,714 | 127,515,950 | 94.96 | 14.08 | 1,337.04 | |||||
Speech Pathology Service | 223,173,331 | 1,970,399 | 113.26 | 0.18 | 20.39 | |||||
Total Non-Standardized ProspectivePayment Amount Per 60-day Episode for FY 2001: | $2,338.90 | |||||||||
Adjustments: | ||||||||||
1.Average cost per episode forNRS included in the home health benefit and reported as costs on thecost report | $43.54 | |||||||||
2.Average payment per episodefor NRS possibly unbundled and billed separately for Part B | $6.08 | |||||||||
3.Average payment per episodefor Part B therapies | $17.76 | |||||||||
4.Average payment per episodefor OASIS one time adjustment for form changes | $5.50 | |||||||||
5.Average payment per episodefor ongoing OASIS adjustment costs | $4.32 | |||||||||
Total Non-Standardized ProspectivePayment Amount for 60-day Episode for FY 2001 Plus Medical Supplies,Part B Therapies and OASIS | $2,416.01 |
3.8.1.3The adjusted non-standardizedprospective payment amount per 60-day episode for FY 2001 was adjustedas follows in Figure 12.4-16 for case-mix, budget neutralityand outliers in the establishment of a final standardized and budgetneutral payment amount per 60-day episode for FY 2001.
Non-Standardized ProspectivePayment Amount Per 60-Days | Standardization FactorFor Wage Index And Case-Mix | Budget Neutrality Factor | Outlier Adjustment Factor | Standardized Prospective PaymentAmount Per 60-Days |
---|---|---|---|---|
$2,416.01 | 0.96184 | 0.88423 | 1.05 | $2,115.30 |
3.8.1.3.1The above 60-day episode paymentcalculations were derived using base-year costs and utilizationrates and subsequently adjusted by annual inflationary update factors,the last three iterations of which can be found in AddendumsC (CY 2019) and C (CY 2020).
3.8.1.3.2The standardized prospectivepayment amount per 60-day EOC is case-mix and wage-adjusted in determiningpayment to a specific HHA for a specific beneficiary. The wage adjustmentis made to the labor portion (0.77668) of the standardized prospectivepayment amount after being multiplied by the beneficiary’s designatedHHRG case-mix weight. For example, a HHA serves a TRICARE beneficiaryin Denver, CO. The HHA determines the patient is in HHRG C2F1S2with a case-mix weight of 1.8496. The following steps are used incalculating the case-mix and wage-adjusted 60-day episode paymentamount:
Step 1:Multiply the standard 60-dayprospective payment amount by the applicable case-mix weight.
(1.8496 x $2,115.30) = $3,912.46
Step 2:Divide the case-mix adjustmentepisode payment into its labor and non-labor portions.
Labor Portion = (0.77668 x$3,912.46) = $3,038.73
Non-Labor Portion = (0.22332x $3,912.46) = $873.73
Step 3:Adjust the labor portion bymultiplying by the wage index factor for Denver, CO.
(1.0190 x $3,038.73) = $3,096.47
Step 4:Add the wage-adjusted laborportion to the non-labor portion to calculate the total case-mixand wage-adjusted episode payment.
($873.73 + $3,096.47) = $3,970.20
3.8.1.4Since the initial methodologyused in calculating the case-mix and wage-adjusted 60-day episodepayment amounts has not changed, the above example is still applicableusing the updated wage indices and 60-day episode payment amounts.
3.8.1.5Annual Updating of HHA PPSRates and Wage Indexes.
In subsequentfiscal years, HHA PPS rates (i.e., both the national 60-day episodeamount and per-visit rates) will be increased by the applicablehome health market basket index change.
3.8.2Calculation of Reduced Payments
Under certain circ*mstances,payment will be less than the full 60-day episode rate to accommodate changesof events during the beneficiary’s care. The start and end datesof each event will be used in the apportionment of the full-episoderate. These reduced payment amounts are referred to as: 1) PEP adjustments;2) SCIC adjustments; 3) LUPAs; and 4) therapy threshold adjustments.Each of these payment reduction methodologies will be discussedin greater detail below.
Note:Since the basic methodologyused in calculating HHA PPS adjustments (i.e., payment reductionsfor PEPs, SCICs, LUPAs, and therapy thresholds) has not changed,the following examples are still applicable using the updated wageindices and 60-day episode payment amounts in AddendumsC (CY 2019) and C (CY 2020).
3.8.2.1PEP Adjustment
The PEP adjustment is usedto accommodate payment for EOCs less than 60 days resulting fromone of the following intervening events: 1) beneficiary electeda transfer prior to the end of the 60-day EOC; or 2) beneficiarydischarged after meeting all treatment goals in the original POCand subsequently readmitted to the same HHA before the end of the60-day EOC. The PEP adjustment is based on the span of days overwhich the beneficiary received treatment prior to the interveningevent; i.e., the days, including the start-of-care date/first billableservice date through and including the last billable service date,before the intervening event. The original POC must be terminatedwith no anticipated need for additional home health services. Anew 60-day EOC would have to be initiated upon return to a HHA, requiringa physician’s recertification of the POC, a new OASIS assessment,and authorization by the contractor. The PEP adjustment is calculatedby multiplying the proportion of the 60-day episode during whichthe beneficiary was receiving care prior to the intervening eventby the beneficiary’s assigned 60-day episode payment. The PEP adjustmentis only applicable for beneficiaries having more than four billablehome health visits. Transfers of beneficiaries between HHAs of commonownership are only applicable when the agencies are located in differentmetropolitan statistical areas. Also, PEP adjustments do not applyin situations where a patient dies during a 60-day EOC. Full episode paymentsare made in these particular cases. For example, a beneficiary assignedto HHRG C2F1S2 and receiving care in Denver, CO was discharged froma HHA on Day 28 of a 60-day EOC and subsequently returned to thesame HHA on Day 40. However, the first billable visit (i.e., a physicianordered visit under a new POC) did not occur until Day 42. The beneficiarymet the requirements for a PEP adjustment, in that the treatmentgoals of the original POC were accomplished and there was no anticipatedneed for home care during the balance of the 60-day episode. Sincethe last visit was furnished on Day 28 of the initial 60-day episode,the PEP adjustment would be equal to the assigned 60-day episodepayment times 28/60, representing the proportion of the 60 daysthat the patient was in treatment. Day 42 of the original episodebecomes Day 1 of the new certified 60-day episode. The followingsteps are used in calculating the PEP adjustment:
Step 1:Calculate the proportion ofthe 60 days that the beneficiary was under treatment.
(28/60) = 0.4667
Step 2:Multiply the beneficiary assigned60-day episode payment amount by the proportion of days that thebeneficiary was under treatment.
($3,970.20 x 0.4667) = $1,852.90
3.8.2.2SCIC Payment Adjustment
For Episodes Beginning On OrAfter January 1, 2008. The refined HH PPS no longer contains a policyto allow for adjustments reflecting SCICs. Episodes paid under therefined HH PPS will be paid based on a single HIPPS code. Claimssubmitted with additional HIPPS codes reflecting SCICs will be returnedto the provider; i.e., claims for episodes beginning on or afterJanuary 1, 2008, that contain more than one revenue code 0023 line.
3.8.2.3LUPA
3.8.2.3.1For Episodes Beginning On OrAfter January 1, 2008
3.8.2.3.2LUPA may be subject to an additionalpayment adjustment. If the LUPA episode is the first episode ina sequence of adjacent episodes or is the only EOC the beneficiaryreceived and the Source of Referral and Admission or Visit Codeis not B (Transfer From AnotherHHA) or C (Readmission to Same HHA), an additionaladd-on payment will be made. A lump-sum established in regulationand updated annually will be added to these claims. The additionalamount for CY 2008 is $87.93.
3.8.2.4TherapyThreshold Adjustment
3.8.2.4.1ForEpisodes Beginning On Or After January 1, 2008
3.8.2.4.1.1The refined HH PPS adjustsMedicare payment based on whether one of three therapy thresholds(6, 14, or 20 visits) is met. As a result of these multiple thresholds,and since meeting a threshold can change the payment equation thatapplies to a particular episode, a simple “fallback” coding structureis no longer possible. Also, additional therapy visits may changethe score in the services domain of the HIPPS code.
3.8.2.4.1.2Due to this increased complexityof the payment system regarding therapies, the Pricer software inthe claims processing system will re-code all claims based on theactual number of therapy services provided. The re-coding will beperformed without regard to whether the number of therapies deliveredincreased or decreased compared to the number of expected therapiesreported on the OASIS assessment and used to base RAP payment. Asin the original HH PPS, the remittance advice will show both theHIPPS code submitted on the claim and the HIPPS code that was usedfor payment, so adjustments can be clearly identified.
3.8.3Calculation of Outlier Payments
3.8.3.1A methodology has been establishedunder the HHA PPS to allow for outlier payments in addition to regular60-day episode payments for beneficiaries generating excessivelylarge treatment costs. The outlier payments under this methodologyare made for those episodes whose estimated imputed costs exceedthe predetermined outlier thresholds established for each HHRG.Outlier payments are not restricted solely to standard 60-day EOC.They may also be extended for atypically costly beneficiaries whoqualify for SCIC or PEP payment adjustments under the HHA PPS. Theoutlier threshold amount for each HHRG is calculated by adding aFDL amount, which is the same for all case-mix groups (HHRGs), tothe HHRG’s 60-day episode payment amount. A FDL amount is also addedto the PEP and SCIC adjustment payments in the establishment ofPEP and SCIC outlier thresholds.
3.8.3.2The outlier payment amountis a proportion of the wage-adjusted estimated imputed costs beyondthe wage-adjusted threshold. The loss-sharing ratio is the proportionof additional costs paid as an outlier payment. The loss-sharingratio, along with the FDL amount, is used to constrain outlier coststo five percent of total episode payments. The estimated imputedcosts are derived from those home health visits actually orderedand received during the 60-day episode. The total visits per disciplineare multiplied by their national average per-visit amounts (referto Figure 12.4-4 forthe calculation of national average per-visit amounts) and are wage-adjusted.The wage-adjusted imputed costs for each discipline are summed toget the total estimated wage-adjusted imputed costs for the 60-dayEOCs. The outlier threshold is then subtracted from the total wage-adjustedimputed per visit costs for the 60-day episode to come up with theimputed costs in excess of the outlier threshold. The amount inexcess of the outlier threshold is multiplied by 80% (i.e., theloss share ratio) to obtain the outlier payment. The HHA receivesboth the 60-day episode and outlier payment. For example, a beneficiaryassigned to HHRG C2L2S2 [case-mix weight of 1.9532 and receivingHHA care in Missoula, MT (wage index of 0.9086)], has physicianorders for and received 54 skilled nursing visits, 48 home healthaide visits, and six physical therapy visits. The following stepsare used in calculating the outlier payment:
3.8.3.2.1Calculationof Case-Mix and Wage-Adjusted Episode Payment
Step 1:Multiply the case-mix weightfor HHRG C2L2S2 by the standard 60-day prospective episode paymentamount.
(1.9532x $2,115.30) = $4,131.60
Step 2:Divide the case-mix-adjustedepisode payment amount into its labor and non-labor portions.
Labor Portion | = | (0.77668 x $4,131.60) | = | $3,208.93 | |
Non-Labor Portion | = | (0.22332 x $4,131.60) | = | $922.67 |
Step 3:Multiply the labor portionof the case-mix adjusted episode payment by the wage index factorfor Missoula, MT.
(0.9086x $3,208.93) = $2,915.63
Step 4:Add the wage-adjusted laborportion to the non-labor portion to get the total case-mix and wage-adjusted60-day episode payment amount.
($2,915.63 + $922.67) = $3,838.30
3.8.3.2.2Calculation of the Wage-AdjustedOutlier Threshold
Step 1:Multiplythe 60-day episode payment amount by the FDL ratio (1.13) to comeup with the FDL amount.
($2,115.30x 1.13) = $2,390.29
Step 2:Divide the FDL amount intoits labor and non-labor portions.
Labor Portion | = | (0.77668 x $2,390.29) | = | $1,856.49 | |
Non-Labor Portion | = | (0.22332 x $2,390.29) | = | $533.80 |
Step 3:Multiply the labor portionof the FDL amount by the wage index for Missoula, MT (0.9086).
(0.9086 x $1,856.49) = $1,686.81
Step 4:Add back the non-labor portionto the wage-adjusted labor portion to get the total wage-adjustedFDL amount.
($1,686.81+ $533.80) = $2,220.61
Step 5:Add the case-mix and wage-adjusted60-day episode payment amount to the wage-adjusted fixed dollaramount to obtain the wage-adjusted outlier threshold.
($3,838.30 + $2,220.61) = $6,058.91
3.8.3.2.3Calculation of Wage-AdjustedImputed Cost of 60-Day Episode
Step 1:Multiplythe total number of visits by the national average cost per visitfor each discipline to arrive at the imputed costs per disciplineover the 60-day episode.
Skilled Nursing Visits | (54 x $95.79) | = | $5,172.66 | |
Home Health Aide Visits | (48 x $43.37) | = | $2,081.76 | |
Physical Therapy Visits | (6 x $104.74) | = | $628.44 |
Step 2:Calculate the wage-adjustedimputed costs by dividing the total imputed cost per disciplineinto their labor and non-labor portions and multiplying the laborportions by the wage index for Missoula, MT (0.9086) and addingback the non-labor portions to arrive at the total wage-adjustedimputed costs per discipline.
1. | Skilled Nursing Visits | |||||||
• | Divide total imputed costsinto their labor and non-labor portions. | |||||||
Labor Portion | = | (0.77668 x $5,172.66) | = | $4,017.50 | ||||
Non-Labor Portion | = | (0.22332 x $5,172.66) | = | $1,155.16 | ||||
• | Wage-adjusted labor portionof imputed costs. | |||||||
($4,017.50 x 0.9086) = $3,650.30 | ||||||||
• | Add back non-labor portionto wage-adjusted labor portion of imputed costs to come up withthe total wage-adjusted imputed costs for skilled nursing visits. | |||||||
($3,650.30 + $1,155.16) = $4,805.46 | ||||||||
2. | Home Health Aide Visits | |||||||
• | Divide total imputed costsinto their labor and non-labor portions. | |||||||
Labor Portion | = | (0.77668 x $2,081.76) | = | $1,616.86 | ||||
Non-Labor Portion | = | (0.22332 x $2,081.76) | = | $464.90 | ||||
• | Wage-adjusted labor portionof imputed costs. | |||||||
($1,616.86 x 0.9086) = $1,469.08 | ||||||||
• | Add back non-labor portionto wage-adjusted labor portion of imputed costs to come up withthe total wage-adjusted imputed costs for home health aide visits. | |||||||
($1,469.08 + $464.90) = $1,933.98 | ||||||||
3. | Physical Therapy Visits | |||||||
• | Divide total imputed costsinto their labor and non-labor portions. | |||||||
Labor Portion | = | (0.77668 x $628.44) | = | $488.10 | ||||
Non-Labor Portion | = | (0.22332 x $628.44) | = | $140.34 | ||||
• | Wage-adjusted labor portionof imputed costs. | |||||||
($488.10 x 0.9086) = $443.49 | ||||||||
• | Add back non-labor portionto wage-adjusted labor portion of imputed costs to come up withthe total wage-adjusted imputed costs for home health aide visits. | |||||||
($443.49 + $140.34) = $583.83 |
Step 3:Add together the wage-adjustedimputed costs for the skilled nursing, home health aide and physicaltherapy visits to obtain the total wage-adjusted imputed costs ofthe 60-day episode.
($4,805.46+ $1,933.98 + $583.83) = $7,323.27
3.8.3.2.4Calculation of Outlier Payment
Step 1:Subtract the outlier thresholdamount from the total wage-adjusted imputed costs to arrive at thecosts in excess of the outlier threshold.
($7,323.27 - $6,058.92) = $1,264.35
Step 2:Multiply the imputed cost amountin excess of the HHRG threshold amount by the loss sharing ratio(80%) to arrive at the outlier payment.
($1,264.35 x 0.80) = $1,011.48
3.8.3.2.5Calculation of Total Paymentto HHA
Add theoutlier payment amount to the case-mix and wage-adjusted 60-dayepisode payment amount to obtain the total payment to the HHA.
($3,838.30 + $1,011.48) = $4,849.78
3.8.3.3Effective January 1, 2017,the methodology to calculate the outlier payment will utilize a cost-per-unitapproach rather than a cost-per-visit approach. The national per-visitrates are converted into per 15 minute unit rates. The per-unitrate by discipline will be used along with the visit length data reportedon the home health claim to calculate the estimated cost of an episodeto determine whether the claim will receive an outlier payment andthe amount of payment for an EOC. The amount of time per day usedto estimate the cost of an episode for the outlier calculation islimited to eight hours or 32 units per day (care is not limited,only the number of hours/units eligible for inclusion in the outlier calculation).For rare instances when more than one discipline of care is providedand there is more than eight hours of care provided in one day,the episode cost associated with the care provided during that daywill be calculated using a hierarchical method based on the costper unit per discipline. The discipline of care with the lowestassociated cost per unit will be discounted in the calculation of episodecost in order to cap the estimation of an episode’s cost at eighthours of care per day.
3.9OtherHealth Insurance (OHI) Under HHA PPS
Payment under the HHA PPS isdependent upon the PPS-specific information submitted by the providerwith the TRICARE Claim (see Section 6).However, if the beneficiary has OHI which has processed the claimas primary payer, it is likely that the information necessary todetermine the TRICARE PPS payment amount will not be available.Therefore, special procedures have been established for processingHHA claims involving OHI. These claims will not be processed asPPS claims. Such claims will be allowed as billed unless there isa provider discount agreement. The only exception to this is caseswhen there is evidence on the face of the claim that the beneficiary’sliability is limited to less than the billed charge (e.g., the OHIhas a discount agreement with the provider under which the provideragrees to accept a percentage of the billed charge as payment infull). In such cases, the TRICARE payment is to be the differencebetween the limited amount established by the OHI and the OHI payment.
- END -